Detail Self-Other Rating Agreement and Leader Effectiveness   Oleh:  Fleenor, John W. ; Brutus, Stephane ; McCauley, Cynthia D. Jenis: Article from Bulletin/Magazine Dalam koleksi: Leadership Quarterly, The vol. 7 no. 4 (1996), page 487-506. Topik: AGREEMENT; self - other rating; agreement; leader effectiveness Ketersediaan Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: LL7.2 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada     Lihat Detail Induk Isi artikel This study examined relationships between two models of self - other rating agreement and leader effectiveness. Using differences between self - and subordinate ratings, managers (N = 2,056) were first categorized into four groups : over - estimators (who rated themselves higher than others rated them) ; under - estimators (who rated themselves lower than others rated them) ; in - agreement / good raters (whose self - ratings were favorable and similar to the ratings of others) ; and, in -agreement / poor raters (whose self - ratings were unfavorable and similar to the ratings of others) (Atwater & Yammarino, in press). Then, managers were classified using a six group model (Brutus, Fleenor, & Taylor, 1996), which introduced a further distinction - over - estimators / good, and under - estimators / poor. With the four group model, superiors appeared to rate in - agreement / good raters and under - estimators as more effective than over - estimators. However, with the six group model, in - agreement / good raters and under - estimator / good raters were not seen as more effective than over -estimator / good raters. The results suggested that six groups are necessary to fairly compare agreement groups. Opini Anda Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini! Kembali

Copyright © 2006, 2007 Unika Atma Jaya, all rights reserved