Accountability for Consequential Decisions : Justifying Ethical Judgments to Audiences  

Oleh:

Schlenker, Barry R. ; Pennington, John

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pspc) vol. 25 no. 9 (1999), page 1067-1081.
Topik: ETHICAL; justifying; ethical judgements; consequential decisions; accountability; audiences
Fulltext: 1067PSPB259.pdf (101.15KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: PP45.6 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

College students believed that they were judges in a real cheating case (in actuality, it was fictitious) under adjudication by a student honor court. Partciipants recommended harsher punishment agter being led to believe that they would explain their decisions in a face - to - face meeting with : (a) an official from the honor court, as compared to a meeting with the student or no anticipated meeting (Experiment 1), or (b) the professor who brought the charge of cheating, as compared to a meeting with the student (Experiment 2). These effects occurred even when participants wrote their decisions after learning that the anticipated meeting was canceled. The salient audience thus seemed to induce shifts in perspective or evaluative orientation during decision making, and not simply reporting shifts designed to please the audience.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali