IRT-Based Assessments of Rater Effects in MultIple-Source Feedback Instruments  

Oleh:

Raju, Nambury S. ; Barr, Michael A.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Organizational Research Methods vol. 6 no. 1 (2003), page 15-43.
Topik: ASSESSMENT; studies; models; methods; statistical analysis; performance appraisal; feedback; measurement; organizational behaviour
Fulltext: 15.pdf (408.11KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: OO3.4 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

This study compares three item response theory - based models of assesing measurement equivalence in 360 celcius feedback : the traditional differential item functioning (IDF) methodology. Muraki's rater's effect model, and patz, junker and johnson's hierarchical rater model. Using data from 491 managers collected on the benchmarks instrument, the authors found that the traditional DIF methodology, provides the most information about the rater's conception of the ratee's ability, whereas the other two models provide explicit estimates of rater leniency / severity. THe authors also found that rater source effects of leniency and severity, even though statistically significant, did not substantially affect the observed score at the item and scale levels. The different results and conclusions produced by each models are discussed.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali