Agreement in Personality Judgments Within and Between Non-Overlapping Social Groups in Collectivist Culture  

Oleh:

Diaz-Loving, Rolando ; Albright, Linda ; Malloy, Thomas E. ; Yueh, Ting Lee ; Qi Dong

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pspc) vol. 30 no. 1 (Jan. 2004), page 106-117.
Topik: Social Relations; culture; personality judgment; social context hypothesis; social relations model
Fulltext: 106PSPB301.pdf (131.96KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: PP45.17 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The social context hypothesis states that people behave differently in different social groups because group norms and context - specific interpersonal relationships uniquely affect behaviour. Consequently, a person who is a member of different, nonoverlapping social groups (i. e., the members of different groups are unacquainted) should be judged consensually on personality traits within each group; however, between groups there should be less agreement in judgments. This research focused on cultural moderation of the social context effect in two collective cultures (China and Mexico) with different norms for interpersonal relationships. Among Chinese, there was greater consensus in trait judgements within groups than between groups, whereas in Mexico, agreement within and between groups was equivalent. Culturally based relationship norms that affect cross - context consistency of behavior and, in turn, the consistency of trait judgments across groups were described.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali