Stranded Between Participanship and The Truth ? A Comparative Analysis of Legal Ethics in The Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems of Justice  

Oleh:

Wilson, Michael ; Nagorcka, Felicity ; Stanton, Michael

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Melbourne University Law Review vol. 29 no. 2 (Aug. 2005), page 448-477.
Topik: JUSTICE; partisanship; truth; ethics; systems; justice

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: MM70 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

In an era of commonality and convergence among different legal systems, the study of comparative legal ethics is important in determining how we assess the merits of developments in our own legal system and profession. The contrast between legal ethics in the adversarial and inquisitorial systems of justice provides an illumination of the differing telos of each system. Whilst there is a significant degree of overlap in the ethical issues confronted by legal practitioners in each system, important differences, particularly in the criminal sphere, reveal very different ethical pressures on advocates. In confronting the danger of ‘non - accountable partisanship’, the common law practitioner should be aware of the merits and pitfalls of each system, lest calls for reform overlook the foundational differences between the systems themselves.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali