Have historical sociologists forsaken theory? Thoughts on the history/theory relationship  

Oleh:

Knapp, Stan J. ; Quadagno, Jill

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) vol. 20 no. 04 (May 1992), page 481-507.
Topik: Historical sociology; Relationship
Fulltext: QUADAGNO-481-507; Bernard.pdf (2.6MB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKPM Nomor Panggil: S28 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

With the re-emergence of historical sociology as a dominant focus of inquiry has come a renewed interest in more general methodological, theoretical, and epistemological issues that have long occupied debates about the relationship between history and theory. A recently published article by Edgar Kiser and Michael Hechter brings to the fore several core themes in these debates. Kiser and Hechter claim that comparative historical sociologists not only have turned against general theory but theories in general. The authors argue that these conclusions are based on a narrow definition of the enterprise of historical sociology and on an attempt to confine the definition of theory to general laws. In this article, they first demonstrate that historical sociologists have not forsaken theory. Next, they articulate the dilemmas that general theories defined as general laws pose for historical analysis, and finally, they delineate what methodologically self-conscious historical sociologists have identified as the core elements of a temporally grounded historical sociology.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali