Defending The Status Quo : Power and Bias in Social Conflict  

Oleh:

Robinson, Robert J. ; Keltner, Dacher

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pspc) vol. 23 no. 10 (1997), page 1066-1077.
Topik: STATUS QUO; status quo; social conflict; power and bias

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: PP45.2 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

We hypothesized that partisans who represent power and the status quo would judge their opponents less accurately than world partisans seeking change, who would be stereotyped as extermists. We surveyed the attitudes and book preference of tradionalist and revisionist english professors, who differed in their inclinations to preserve or change the literary status quo. Both groups overstimated the differences in their attitudes and book preferences, the extermity of their opponent's conviction, and the numerical balances of the two sides. Consistent with the status quo hypothese, tradtionalists were more prone to polarize the two sides' attitudes and underestimate the book preferences they shared with their opponents, and both sides attribtued more extreme convitions to revisionists. Discussion focused on mechanisms related to power - related biases.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali