Anda belum login :: 24 Nov 2024 10:22 WIB
Detail
ArtikelHow Complex Simple Words Can Be  
Oleh: Schreuder, Robert ; Baayen, R. Harald
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Memory and Language (Full Text) vol. 37 no. 1 (Jul. 1997), page 118-139.
Fulltext: 37_01_Schreuder_Baayen.pdf (207.61KB)
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan PKBB
    • Nomor Panggil: 405/JML/37
    • Non-tandon: tidak ada
    • Tandon: 1
 Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelA series of experiments investigated components of the word frequency effect in visual lexical decision, progressive demasking, and subjective frequency ratings. For simplex, i.e., monomorphemic, nouns in Dutch, we studied the effect of the frequency of the monomorphemic noun itself as well as the effect of the frequencies of morphologically related forms on the processing of these monomorphemic nouns. The experiments show that the frequency of the (unseen) plural forms affects the experimental measures. Nouns with high-frequency plurals are responded to more quickly in visual lexical decision, and they receive higher subjective frequency ratings. However, the summed frequencies of the formations in the morphological family of a given noun (the compounds and derived words in which that noun appears as a constituent) did not affect the experimental measures. Surprisingly, the size of the morphological family, i.e., the number of different words in the family, emerged as a substantial factor. A monomorphemic noun with a large family size elicits higher subjective frequency ratings and shorter response latencies in visual lexical decision than a mono morphemic noun with a small family size. The effect of family size disappears in progressive demasking, a task which taps into the earlier stages of form identification. This suggests that the effect of family size arises at more central, post-identification stages of lexical processing. @ 1997 Academic Press
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.03125 second(s)