The Perceptions of Students and Teachers About the Level of the Sanctions for Academic Integrity Violations: an Explanatory Sequential Design Study in a Nursing Education Program  

Oleh:

Anggreini, Yogik Setia ; Prabandari, Yayi Suryo ; Prihatiningsih, Titi Savitri

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional - tidak terakreditasi DIKTI - non-atma jaya
Dalam koleksi: Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) vol. 06 no. 02 (Jul. 2017), page 84-92.
Topik: Academic Integrity; Perception; The Level of Sanctions
Fulltext: J10 v6 n2 p84 kelik2017.pdf (232.13KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: J10.K Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Background: Professional Behavior is a reflection of the professionalism, which includes academic integrity. Some of student’s behavioral violations related to academic integrity are influenced by perception. However, students and lecturers tend to interpret these violations differently associated with severity of academic integrity, for example, the sanction against violations of academic integrity. Thus, these differences may contribute to the number of occurrences of academic integrity violations. This study aims to identify the perception of nursing students and lecturers about the level of sanctions for violations of academic integrity. Method: This study used a mixed method using a sequential explanatory design. This was also a quantitative research survey using a questioner to 101 nursing students, followed by focus group discussion done by the students and in-depth interviews to four lecturers. Results: The behavior deemed not to be in violation was 1% -5.9%. Most students chose sanction level 2 (21.8% - 66.35%), sanction level 3 (23.8% - 28.7%) and the highest sanction level or level 10 (19.8%). Conclusion: The perception of students to the sanction level out of 22 items, 15 items nursing students chose sanction level 2 “verbal warning” (21.8% - 66.35%), 2 items students chose sanction level 3 “written warning” (23.8% -28.7%). The highest sanction level chosen was level 10 “reported to the professional regulatory body” (19.8%). The lecturers assumed that mild sanction first given was in the form of verbal warning and the toughest was being suspended.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali