Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't  

Oleh:

Zwicky, Arnold M. ; Pullum, Geoffrey K.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Language (ada di JSTOR) vol. 59 no. 3 (Sep. 1983), page 502-513.
Fulltext: CLITICIZATION VS. INFLECTION.pdf (282.54KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKBB Nomor Panggil: 405/LAN/59 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Two types of bound morphemes-clitics and inflectional affixes-are found attached to (free) words in many languages. At least six lines of evidence separate the clear cases on each side: the degree of selection between the dependent morpheme and the word to which it is attached; arbitrary lexical gaps; phonological idiosyncrasies; semantic idiosyncrasies; syntactic operations affecting the combinations; and restrictions on the combinability of cIitics with inflectional affixes. These criteria all indicate that English contracted auxiliaries (She's gone) are cIitics, but that the English contracted negative (She hasn't gOne) is an inflectional affix-a rather surprising conclusion that turns out to have satisfying consequences. *

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali