Randomized Crossover Comparison of Personalized MPC and PID Control Algorithms for the Artificial Pancreas  

Oleh:

Pinsker, Jordan E. ; Joon Bok Lee ; Seborg, Dale E. ; Bradley, Paige K. ; Doyle III, Francis J. ; Dassau, Eyal

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Diabetes Care vol. 39 no. 07 (Jul. 2016), page 1135-1142.
Topik: Artificial Pancreas; AP; Model Predictive Control; MPC; Proportional Integral Derivative; PID

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: D05.K Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

OBJECTIVE To evaluate two widely used control algorithms for an artificial pancreas (AP) under nonideal but comparable clinical conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After a pilot safety and feasibility study (n = 10), closed-loop control (CLC) was evaluated in a randomized, crossover trial of 20 additional adults with type 1 diabetes. Personalized model predictive control (MPC) and proportional integral derivative (PID) algorithms were compared in supervised 27.5-h CLC sessions. Challenges included overnight control after a 65-g dinner, response to a 50-g breakfast, and response to an unannounced 65-g lunch. Boluses of announced dinner and breakfast meals were given at mealtime. The primary outcome was time in glucose range 70–180 mg/dL. RESULTS Mean time in range 70–180 mg/dL was greater for MPC than for PID (74.4 vs. 63.7%, P = 0.020). Mean glucose was also lower for MPC than PID during the entire trial duration (138 vs. 160 mg/dL, P = 0.012) and 5 h after the unannounced 65-g meal (181 vs. 220 mg/dL, P = 0.019). There was no significant difference in time with glucose <70 mg/dL throughout the trial period. CONCLUSIONS This first comprehensive study to compare MPC and PID control for the AP indicates that MPC performed particularly well, achieving nearly 75% time in the target range, including the unannounced meal. Although both forms of CLC provided safe and effective glucose management, MPC performed as well or better than PID in all metrics.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali