Remarks on Groenendijk and Stokhof's Theory of Inderect Questions  

Oleh:

Zimmermann, Thomas Ede

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Linguistics and Philosophy=> ada di SpringerLink 1997(vol.1) - Mutakhir; JSTOR vol. 8 no. 4 (Nov. 1985), page 431-448.

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKBB Nomor Panggil: 405/LAP/8 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Jeroen Groenendijk and Martin Stokhof (henceforth: G & St) have recently presented an analysis of wh-complements and that-clauses0 that differs from most earlier approaches in at least two ways: not only do they assign the same logical type to whether-, which-, who-, and that-clauses, they also suggest that a proper description of these phenomena can only be given by holding them to involve a more complex kind of intensionality than has ever been considered before. Although G & St have presented their theory in great detail, they seem to have overlooked some of its aspects and consequences. In this paper, I want to discuss a few of these.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali