Detail Riset Linguistik Dengan Metode Partisipatoris tentang Negasi Gramatikal Dalam Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia (BISINDO) = Linguistic Research Using Participartory Methods: Grammatical Negation in Indonesian Sign Language   Oleh:  Palfreyman, Nick Jenis: Article from Proceeding Dalam koleksi: KOLITA 14 : Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya Keempat Belas, page 1-6. Fulltext: hal 1-6.pdf (18.75MB) Ketersediaan Perpustakaan PKBB Nomor Panggil: 406 KLA 14 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 1) Tandon: 1    Reserve Lihat Detail Induk Isi artikel Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia (BISINDO) is one of hundreds of sign languages used around the world, and has emerged naturally in Indonesia over the last 60 years or so. BISINDO is a different language to Bahasa Indonesia, and has its own lexicon and grammar. There is little awareness of the linguistic status of sign languages, even among linguists of spoken languages, but happily this is starting to change: awareness of sign language varieties in Indonesia is growing, and robust documentation has begun. Over fifty years of research on sign languages has shown that they have equivalent structures to spoken languages at every level of linguistic organisation, from phonology and morphology to syntax and discourse. At the same time, there are some obvious differences between the two modalities, not only linguistically but also in the sociolinguistic features of speech and sign communities. This paper begins with a discussion of similarities and differences between spoken and sign language linguistics. These ideas are demonstrated with regard to the expression of grammatical negation in varieties of BISINDO. Using a corpus of spontaneous conversational data collected in Solo and Makassar, over 800 grammatically negative constructions have been analysed. It is found that predicates can be negated using one of four main grammatical variants. Quantitative multivariate analysis has been undertaken to identify linguistic and social factors that affect the choice of variable, and examples of these factors are given. As with spoken languages, there are intriguing differences between sign languages, and negation is well suited to showing this. Sign language research has the potential to transform the lives of deaf community members, who continue to face barriers to education and participation in mainstream society. I conclude with some thoughts about ethical research practices and the benefits of participatory research methods for sign language users. Opini Anda Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini! Kembali

Copyright © 2006, 2007 Unika Atma Jaya, all rights reserved