Ending The CEO Succession Crisis  

Oleh:

Charan, Ram

Jenis: Article from Bulletin/Magazine - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Harvard Business Review bisa di lihat di link (http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/command/detail?sid=f227f0b4-7315-44a4-a7f7-a7cd8cbad80b%40sessionmgr114&vid=12&hid=105&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bth&jid=HBR) vol. 83 no. 2 (Feb. 2005), page 72-81.
Topik: ceo; CEO; corporate governance; decision making; executive selection; executives; leadership; managerial selection; succession planning

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: HH10.27 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The CEO succession process is broken. Many companies have no meaningful succession plans, and few of the ones that do are happy with them. CEO tenure is shrinking ; in fact, two out of five CEO s fail in their first 18 months. It isn't just that more CEOs are being replaced ; it's that they're being replaced badly. The problems extend to every aspect of CEO succession : internal development programs, board supervision, and outside recruitment. While many organizations do a decent job of nurturing middle managers, few have set up the comprehensive programs needed to find the half - dozen true CEO candidates out of the thousands of leaders in their midst. Even more damaging is the failure of boards to devote enough attention to succession. Search committee members often have no experience hiring CEOs ; lacking guidance, they supply either the narrowest or the most general of requirements and then fail to vet either the candidates or the recruiters. The result is that too often new CEO s are plucked from the well - worn Rolodexes of a remarkably small number of recruiters. These candidates may be strong in charisma but may lack critical skills or otherwise be a bad fit with the company. The resulting high turnover is particularly damaging, given that outside CEO s often bring in their own teams, can cause the company to lose focus, and are especially costly to be rid of. Drawing on over 35 years of experience with CEO succession, the author explains how companies can create a deep pool of internal candidates, how boards can consistently align strategy and leadership development, and how directors can get their money's worth from recruiters. Choosing a CEO should be not one decision but an amalgam of thousands of decisions made by many people every day over years.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali