Anda belum login :: 23 Nov 2024 05:53 WIB
Detail
ArtikelNational utilization patterns of Mohs micrographic surgery for invasive melanoma and melanoma in situ  
Oleh: Viola, Kate V. ; Rezzadeh, Kameron S. ; Gonsalves, Lou ; Patel, Payal ; Gross, Cary P.
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: JAAD: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (keterangan: ada di ClinicalKey) vol. 72 no. 06 (Jun. 2015), page 1060–1065 .
Topik: disparities; melanoma; Mohs micrographic surgery; population-based; surgical excision; Surveillance; Epidemiology; and End Results; utilization rates
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan FK
    • Nomor Panggil: J15.K
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelBackground Although wide local excision continues to be commonly used for melanoma treatment, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for the treatment of melanomas remains controversial. Objective We sought to determine national utilization patterns for MMS in the treatment of invasive melanoma and melanoma in situ. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients receiving surgical excision (MMS or wide local excision) for the treatment of invasive melanoma and melanoma in situ was performed using data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Results A total of 195,768 melanomas were diagnosed from 2003 through 2009 from the 17 SEER registries. Utilization of MMS for invasive melanoma and melanoma in situ increased by 60% from 2003 to 2008. Of all SEER-captured lesions treated by surgical excision in this time period, 3.5% (6872) were excised by MMS. Limitations Patient insurance status, physician reimbursement practices, and health care provider type were not addressed in this article. Conclusion Use of MMS for melanoma appears to be increasing. Future studies should explore whether this is associated with better outcomes.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)