Anda belum login :: 23 Nov 2024 22:52 WIB
Detail
ArtikelWord boundaries and sandhi roles in natural generative phonology.  
Oleh: Clayton, Mary L.
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Language (ada di JSTOR) vol. 57 no. 3 (Nov. 1981), page 571-590.
Fulltext: WORD BOUNDARIES AND SANDHI RULES IN NATURAL.pdf (459.13KB)
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan PKBB
    • Nomor Panggil: 405/LAN/57
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelThis paper examines the claims in Natural Generative Phonology (NGP) that phonetically conditioned rules do not make reference to word boundaries, and that sandhi rules constitute a type of rule 'intermediate between P-rules and MP-rules', It is concluded that sandhi rules without (other) morphosyntactic information are like P-rules except for the presence of a word boundary, supposedly a non-phonological boundary, Ifthis is the only reason for separating these sandhi rules from P-rules, then the dilTerence is merely one of definition; and the claim that P-rules may not be conditioned by word boundaries is vacuous, since it is true by definition. The reason that proponents of NGP insist upon the nclusion of word boundaries from P-rules is their adherence to a requirement that no non-phono:ogical information playa par: in phonological generalizations. If it can be demonstrated that word boundaries do indeed playa part in P-rulesand if, further, the definition of 'P-rule' can be established without circularity (i.e. without including or excluding word boundaries b) definition)-then one of the major distinguishing tenets ofNGP is shown to be without basis, since it is clear that word boundaries are indeed not purely phonological..
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)