Value Engineering In Construction Method Rusunawa Prototype Building 5 Floor  

Oleh:

Dinariana, Dwi ; Lukito, Imia

Jenis: Article from Proceeding
Dalam koleksi: Proceeding The 1st International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials (SCESCM) di Yogyakarta, September 11 – 13, 2012, page 321-326.
Topik: Value Engineering; Construction Methods; Building.
Fulltext: 44.pdf (447.46KB)

Isi artikel

Since the introduction of the National Movement of One Million Houses Development (GNPSR) by the Government in 2004, the achievement of development Rusuna (Rumah Susun Sederhana = Simple Flats) until mid-2006 a new range ± 5,000 units / year from a target of 60,000 units Rusunawa (Rumah Susun Sederhana Sewa = Simple flats rent for low-income communities). The government target is of course requires no small amount of the budget, it would require effort - an effort to suppress the price of Value Engineering (VE) such that but without reducing the quality and the quality of the building itself. And for the achievement of these targets needs to be done the business - business development acceleration Rusuna. One attempt was to compare two methods of acceleration implementation the conventional method and the method of precast. Based on these problems required a study to calculate the VE in a Prototype Development Project Rusunawa 5 Floors in terms of implementation methods, to reduce production costs without reducing the quality of the building and create a project plan based on the VE by using Microsoft Project to get the most efficient time planning and fast . Analysis carried out calculations on the method of implementation of the methods of precast concrete systems and conventional systems. From the comparison of the methods of implementation precast construction and conventional construction, selected the most efficient price, then do the planning of the VE was selected to plan a schedule for implementing the most efficient. From the results of the analysis, it is observed that for the method of implementation, the method selected precast concrete system with an efficiency of 26.84% price structure and time schedule for implementation is faster than conventional methods of Implementation.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali