Anda belum login :: 23 Nov 2024 18:48 WIB
Detail
ArtikelFactors Affecting Composition Evaluation in an EFL Context: Cultural Rhetorical Pattern and Readers’ Background  
Oleh: Kobayashi, Hiroe ; Rinnert, Carol
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies (Full Text) vol. 46 no. 3 (1996), page 397-437.
Fulltext: 46_03_Kobayashi.pdf (1.88MB)
Isi artikelWe investigated how 465 readers with different backgrounds (differing L1, academic status, and amounts of writing instruction) evaluated 16 versions of Japanese university English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ English compositions containing different culturally influenced rhetorical patterns (Japanese vs. American English) as well as two other features (coherence breaks and language use errors). Among other factors, including coherence and language use, culturally influenced rhetorical patterns affected assessment of EFL student writing on an analysis of effects topic. Overall, Japanese students who had not received English writing instruction preferred the Japanese rhetorical pattern, native English teachers favored the American rhetorical pattern, and Japanese students who had received English writing instruction and Japanese teachers valued features of both patterns. There were no significant differences between the two teacher groups in the overall assessment ofthe two rhetorical patterns, but Japanese English teachers, similar to Japanese students, gave significantly higher scores than native English teachers to the Japanese introduction. On a comparisodcontrast topic, other discourse features, particularly paragraph level coherence problems, appeared to override rhetorical pattern in terms of influence on writing quality scores. The results suggest that a flexible approach to permissible rhetorical patterns and a greater emphasis on coherence may prove beneficial for EFL writing instruction.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.046875 second(s)