Motoric versus contrastive approaches to phonology therapy: a case study  

Oleh:

Masterson, Julie J. ; Daniels, Dana L.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Child Language Teaching and Therapy (Full Text & ada di PROQUEST) vol. 7 no. 2 (Jun. 1991), page 127.
Fulltext: Child Language Teaching and Therapy-1991-Masterson-127-40.pdf (761.04KB)

Isi artikel

A child with two therapy. be One primarily of Mississippi correspondence: Julie J. approaches a case Masterson, Department of study Speech Pathology, Arizona State University, Tempe, phonological phonological error, due to (/r/ simplification) cognitive-linguistic trasts. In in order Possible discussed, are contrast, for Arizona 85287, errors was seen sibilant USA. for four distortion, articulatory (motor) difficulties, was not. treatment Simplification of approach sibilant distortion consistent accuracy explanations for and clinical suggested. Introduction Until the early to the /r/ semesters was determined to whereas the other responded centred around the use required of well to a of motoric-based treatment at the conversational level to occur. different responses implications mid-1970s, focused on the motor movements (McDonald, 1964; distinctive feature applied and to treatment Bennett, 1972; Van and directions treatment for necessary con- to treatment are for future speech research

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali