Anda belum login :: 27 Nov 2024 06:49 WIB
Home
|
Logon
Hidden
»
Administration
»
Collection Detail
Detail
Evaluating Theories
Oleh:
Dennis, Simon
;
Kintsch, Walter
Jenis:
Article from Books - E-Book
Dalam koleksi:
Critical Thinking in Psychology
,
page 143-159.
Topik:
Descriptive Adequacy
;
Precision and Interpretability
;
Coherence and Consistency
;
Prediction and Falsi?ability
Fulltext:
Evaluating Theories.pdf
(130.25KB)
Isi artikel
All theories are false (Popper, 1959). So in one sense evaluating theories is a straightforward matter. However, some theories are more false than others. Furthermore, some theories have characteristics that tend to promote the advance of scienti?c knowledge. In this chapter, we examine what some of those characteristics are and how one goes about the process of identifying and building useful theories. A theory is a concise statement about how we believe the world to be. Theories organize observations of the world and allow researchers to make predictions about what will happen in the future under certain conditions. Science is about the testing of theories, and the data that we collect as scientists should either implicitly or explicitly bear on theory. There is, however, a great difference between theories in the hard sciences and theories in the soft sciences in their formal rigor. Formal theories are well established and incredibly successful in physics, but they play a lesser role in biology, and even less in psychology, where theories are often stated in verbal form. This has certainly been true historically, but some scientists, especially physicists, as well as laypeople, construe this fact to mean that formal theories are restricted to the hard sciences, particularly physics, while formalization is unattainable in the soft sciences. There is absolutely no reason to think so. Indeed, this is a pernicious idea that would permanently relegate psychology to second-class status. If nature is governed by causal laws, they govern both the simplest physical phenomena (which, when analyzed at the level of quantum mechanics, turn out not to be so simple at all) as well as the higher-order phenomena in biology and psychology. Human behavior is neither vague nor indeterminate, and hence should be described with equal rigor as physical phenomena.
Opini Anda
Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!
Kembali
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)