Anda belum login :: 27 Nov 2024 02:06 WIB
Home
|
Logon
Hidden
»
Administration
»
Collection Detail
Detail
Hjelmslev’s Glossematics: A source of inspiration to Systemic Functional Linguistics?
Oleh:
Bache, Carl
Jenis:
Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi:
Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdiciplinary Journal of Language Studies vol. 42 no. 9 (Sep. 2010)
,
page 2562–2578.
Topik:
Hjelmslev
;
Glossematics Halliday
;
Systemic functional linguistics (SFL) History of linguistics Paradigmatic relations
;
Stratification
;
Function
;
System
;
Text
;
Immanence Source of inspiration
;
Research ethics
Fulltext:
Bache_C.pdf
(352.37KB)
Isi artikel
Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) often pays tribute to one of the great 20th century figures in European Linguistics, Louis Hjelmslev, and his theory of Glossematics. This is surprising because Glossematics is a formally oriented, strictly immanent approach to language while SFL is a functional theory focusing on language as a social semiotic. This paper offers an examination of both theories and attempts to trace similarities and differences on a number of issues with which they share a theoretical concern: the role of paradigmatic relations, the notions of function, text, stratification and immanence, and the overall descriptive goals in linguistics. The paper concludes that except for the basic recognition of the primacy of paradigmatic relations and the abstract idea of the stratification of the content plane, there is little or no similarity between Glossematics and SFL. In fact, many of the references to Glossematics in SFL writings may give the reader an inaccurate impression of Hjelmslev. More generally, while accepting that finding inspiration in a theory does not necessarily involve an obligation to remain faithful to that theory, the paper argues that we all still owe it to earlier generations of scholars to recognize their work for what it really was.
Opini Anda
Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!
Kembali
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)