Abstraction and adherence in discourse processes  

Oleh:

Wood, Tahir

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdiciplinary Journal of Language Studies vol. 41 no. 3 (Mar. 2009), page 484–496.
Topik: Discourse; Adherence; Abstraction; Macro-proposition; Subjectivity; Onomasiology; Semasiology
Fulltext: Wood_Tahir.pdf (178.16KB)

Isi artikel

This theoretical article is concerned with diachronic discourse processes. In particular it explores the following hypothesis: The origin of an abstract termlies in the function of summarising, or standing in place of, a narrative or narratives. Themeaning of an abstraction is to be found ultimately in the kinds of stories from which it emerged. Abstraction is thus an inter-textual phenomenon. The article is based on a distinction that is drawn between coherence and adherence, the former pertaining to intra-textual relations and the latter pertaining to inter-textual relations. Inter-textual relations emerge over time. Texts cohere globally through macro-propositions, which are a form of summary representation; but texts also adhere to one another, which they do by sharing macro-propositions. Certain of those macro-propositions may themselves become summarised as an abstract concept, so that the abstract nominal becomes a summary representation of a body of discourse (i.e. larger than a single text). The contested and problematic nature of meaning in the case of hyper-abstract concepts arises from the relationships between their use and the prior discourse from which they are derived and which they may evoke in complex and unpredictable ways.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali