Conceptualising ‘the relational’ in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments  

Oleh:

Spencer-Oatey, Helen

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdiciplinary Journal of Language Studies vol. 43 no. 14 (2011), page 3565–3578.
Topik: Interpersonal relations Relational work Rapport management Emotions (Im)politeness Project partnerships
Fulltext: Spencer-Oatey_H.pdf (234.85KB)

Isi artikel

Over the past few years, there has been an increased focus on ‘the relational’ in pragmatics. However, different pragmatics scholars (e.g. Holmes and Marra, 2004; Locher and Watts, 2005; Arundale, 2006; Spencer-Oatey 2000/2008) take different approaches to ‘the relational’ and use different terms when analysing interpersonal relations. As a result, there is considerable conceptual and terminological confusion. There are also a number of controversial issues, one of which is how interpersonal relations can best be studied from a pragmatic perspective. Most people agree that it is essential to hear the voice of the participants, yet there is less agreement as to how best to achieve that. I argue in this paper that one fruitful way is to examine the emotions and (im)politeness judgements that people recount in metapragmatic comments. I report a study of workplace project partnerships that illustrates the insights that such an approach can offer. The insights are of both theoretical and applied relevance, which is important because the effective management of diverse teams is widely recognised as particularly challenging. I contend that pragmatics research into interpersonal relations should be able to identify and illuminate such challenges for project participants, and I provide empirical evidence that an exclusive focus on discourse data is too limited for this.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali