Bringing Science to the Art of Strategy  

Oleh:

Lafley, A.G. ; Martin, Roger L. ; Rivkin, Jan W. ; Siggelkow, Nicolaj

Jenis: Article from Bulletin/Magazine - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Harvard Business Review bisa di lihat di link (http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/command/detail?sid=f227f0b4-7315-44a4-a7f7-a7cd8cbad80b%40sessionmgr114&vid=12&hid=105&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bth&jid=HBR) vol. 90 no. 9 (Sep. 2012), page 56-66.
Topik: Strategic Planners; Extensive Analysis; Driven by Numbers; Operations Managers

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: HH10.45 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Strategic planners pride themselves on their rigor. Strategies are supposed to be driven by numbers and extensive analysis and uncontaminated by bias, judgment, or opinion. The larger the spreadsheets, the more confident an organization is in its process. All those numbers, all those analyses, feel scientific, and in the modern world, “scientific” equals “good.” Yet if that’s the case, why do the operations managers in most large and midsize firms dread the annual strategic planning ritual? Why does it consume so much time and have so little impact on company actions? Talk to those managers, and you will most likely uncover a deeper frustration: the sense that strategic planning does not produce novel strategies. Instead, it perpetuates the status quo.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali