Social Dominance Orientation: Revisiting the Structure and Function of a Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes  

Oleh:

Ho, Arnold K. ; Sidanius, Jim ; Pratto, Felicia ; Levin, Shana ; Thomsen, Lotte ; Kteily, Nour ; Sheehy-Skeffington, Jennifer

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pspc) vol. 38 no. 5 (May 2012), page 583-606.
Topik: SDO; Social Dominance Orientation; SDO-Dominance; SDO-Egalitarianism; Legitimizing Ideologies; Hierarchy-Enhancing and-Attenuating Social Policy
Fulltext: PSPB_38_05_583.pdf (606.2KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: PP45.46 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Social dominance orientation (SDO) is one of the most powerful predictors of inter-group attitudes and behavior. Although SDO works well as a unitary construct, some analyses suggest it might consist of two complementary dimensions—SDO-Dominance (SDO-D), or the preference for some groups to dominate others, and SDO-Egalitarianism (SDO-E), a preference for none-egalitarian inter-group relations. Using seven samples from the United States and Israel, the authors confirm factor-analytic evidence and show predictive validity for both dimensions. In the United States, SDO-D was theorized and found to be more related to old-fashioned racism, zero-sum competition, and aggressive inter-group phenomena than SDO-E; SDO-E better predicted more subtle legitimizing ideologies, conservatism, and opposition to redistributive social policies. In a contentious hierarchical inter-group context (the Israeli–Palestinian context), SDO-D better predicted both conservatism and aggressive inter-group attitudes. Fundamentally, these analyses begin to establish the existence of complementary psychological orientations underlying the preference for group-based dominance and inequality.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali