Anda belum login :: 24 Nov 2024 00:46 WIB
Home
|
Logon
Hidden
»
Administration
»
Collection Detail
Detail
Capital Controversy: Free Exchange
Oleh:
[s.n]
Jenis:
Article from Bulletin/Magazine
Dalam koleksi:
The Economist (http://search.proquest.com/) vol. 403 no. 8781 (Apr. 2012)
,
page 78.
Topik:
Economic Policy
;
Capital
;
Gross Domestic Product--GDP
;
Investment
Ketersediaan
Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
Nomor Panggil:
EE29.71
Non-tandon:
1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
Tandon:
tidak ada
Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikel
The IMF says so. Academics and Western governments agree. China invests too much. It is an article of faith that China needs to re-balance its economy by investing less and consuming more. Otherwise, it is argued, diminishing returns on capital will cramp future growth; or, worse still, massive overcapacity will cause a slump in investment, bringing the economy crashing down. So where exactly is all this excessive investment? Most people point to the rapid growth in China's capital spending and its unusually high share of GDP. Fixed-asset investment (the most widely cited figure, because it is reported monthly) has grown at a breathtaking annual rate of 26% over the past seven years. Yet these numbers are misleading. They are not adjusted for inflation and they include purchases of existing assets, such as land, that are inflated by the rising value of land and property. A more reliable measure, and the one used in other countries, is real fixed-capital formation, which is measured on a value-added basis like GDP. This has increased by a less alarming annual average of 12% over the past seven years, not that much faster than the 11% growth rate in GDP in that period.
Opini Anda
Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!
Kembali
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)