PERBANDINGAN AJARAN SHANKARA DAN RAMANUJA MENGENAI MANUSIA DAN PEMBEBASANNYA  

Oleh:

Sudiarja, A.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional - terakreditasi DIKTI
Dalam koleksi: Diskursus: Jurnal Filsafat Teologi STF Driyarkara vol. 10 no. 02 (Oct. 2011), page 147.
Topik: Advaita Vedanta; Vishish Advaita Vedanta; Purusharta; Moksha; Atman; Nirguna Brahman: Saguna Brahman; Avidya; Vaishnava

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKPM Nomor Panggil: D49 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Shankara and Ramanuja were two leading figures of the Indian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. They were the founders of two important schools in orthodox Indian Philosophy (Darshana), the Advaita and Vishish>advaita Vedanta respectively. Even though both of them claimed to follow faithfully the Vedanta tradition, it is clear that their doctrines are quite different with regard to God, man, and salvation. Shankara believed that reality is one without a second (monism), whereas Ramanuja main-tained that souls must be qualitatively distinguished from God, even though they cannot be separated from Him, or better said, they are held in the one reality of God (panentheism). Both systems imply naturally different doctrines with regard to salvation or human liberation.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali