Chess Versus Quasi - Chess : The Role of Knowledge of Legal Rules  

Oleh:

Yoskowitz, Jack

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The American Journal of Psychology vol. 104 no. 03 (1991), page 355-366.
Topik: quasi experimentation; Chess; Quasi; Role of Knowledge; Legal Rules
Fulltext: 1423244.pdf (1.19MB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKPM Nomor Panggil: A12 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The importance of the knowledge of legal rules in determining chess skill at the lower levels was determined using individuals who had never played chess before and individuals who knew the basic rules but were not rated for competition. The subjects' intake of perceptual cues was studied by measuring the time required to search for checks using the standard rules in game and in random positions. In the second half of the experiment, all subjects were taught five new rules for the chess pieces and performed the same perceptual task (searching for checks) as before. Skill level and type of rules (chess vs. quasi-chess) interacted. The reaction time of the naive subjects improved in the second (quasi-chess) half, but the reaction time of the knowledgeable subjects in the quasi-chess half increased. Skill level and type of position (game vs. random) did not interact. These two results taken together suggest that knowledge of the legal rules may play a greater role than memory for specific positions in improving chess skill at the lower levels

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali