Anda belum login :: 27 Nov 2024 15:14 WIB
Detail
ArtikelPonzi-Scheme Losses: Indirect Investor and State Tax Issues  
Oleh: Nichols, Nancy B. ; VanDenburgh, William M.
Jenis: Article from Bulletin/Magazine
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Accountancy vol. 211 no. 2 (Feb. 2011), page 46-55.
Topik: Ponzi schemes; fraud; monetary losses; tax implications; investment; tax treatment
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
    • Nomor Panggil: JJ85.30
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelPonzi schemes continue to come to light regularly. After 2008, when Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme was exposed, the SEC made comprehensive reforms to better detect fraud within the 11,000 regulated investment advisers and 8,000 mutual funds that it oversees, according to the SEC's description of those reforms. As a result of its increased enforcement efforts, in 2009 the SEC initiated 60 enforcement actions against alleged Ponzi schemes. They included Houston financier Robert Allen Stanford's alleged $8 billion ruse. In each of these cases, besides their monetary losses, alleged victims face tax implications that CPAs can help untangle. This article describes tax guidance regarding the treatment of Ponzi-scheme losses from both federal and state tax perspectives. Revenue Ruling 2009-9 addressed the amount, character and timing of investment theft losses, and Revenue Procedure 2009-20 provided a safe harbor for taxpayers reporting them. Eight states have adopted specific guidance regarding the tax treatment of Ponzi losses.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)