Dialog Antar Umat Beragama Ketegangan Antara Keterbukaan dan Identitas  

Oleh:

Dister, Nico Syukur

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional
Dalam koleksi: Limen: Jurnal Agama dan Kebudayaan vol. 6 no. 2 (Apr. 2010), page 49-68.
Topik: Pluralisme; language of hospitality; etika penerjemahan; ketegangan antara kesetiaan dan pengkhianatan; pergumulan dengan Allah; mitra tutur dan iman kita sendiri

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: LL20.3 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Today interreligious dialogue seems to have reached an impasse because of the opposire opinions represented by pluralism and postliberal particularlism. Pluralist argue that religious identity implies openness to religious otherness. Postliberal particularlists, by contrast, draw attention to the value of identity and underline not only the importance of commitment but also particularity of the irreducible difference between religious languages. From this perspective, postliberal particularlism claims that religions are untranslatable. In the face of adversity in the dialogue between religions, created by claim, Marianne Moyaert from the Catholic University of Leuven (Belgium) gave the impasse a new turn. She is inspired by Paul Ricoeur's latest publication On Translation (2006), which he dedicated to the enigma of linguistic diversity and the question of whether languages can be translated. Ricoeur states that this hospitality can serve as a model for inter-religious dialogue. Reflecting on this suggestion, Moyaert elaborates Ricoeur's thought, hoping it will illuminate the current discussion between pluralists and postliberal particularists. Consistent with Ricoeur's position, she argues that religious languages can be translated and that inter-religious dialogue is possible, when built on an ethical posture of hermeneutical hospitality towards the religious other.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali