Clinical Research in Context: Reexamining The Distinction Between Research and Practice  

Oleh:

Anderson, James A.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy vol. 35 no. 1 (Feb. 2010), page 46-63.
Topik: Epistemology; Ethics; Medicine; Practice; Research

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: MM80.23 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

At leats since the seminal work of the (US) National Commissin for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research in The 1970s, a fundamental distinciton between research and practice has underwritten both conceptual work in research ethics and regulations governing research involving human subjects. Notwithstanding its undoubted historical importance, I believe the distinction is problematics because it misrepresents clinical inquiry. In this essay, I aim to clarify the character of clinical inquiryby indentifying crucial contextual constraints on justification constitutive of clinical science. This analysis shows that, from an epistemological point of view, clinical research and clinical practice are not sharply distinct but intimately intertwined. This result is important in its own right-an enriched understanding of the epistemology of clinical research is valuable in and of itself. But this result is also important because it has profound implications for the ethics of human subjects research.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali