Anda belum login :: 23 Nov 2024 12:31 WIB
Detail
ArtikelGetting Better with Age  
Oleh: Latino, Frank
Jenis: Article from Bulletin/Magazine - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Machine Design (Soft Copy ada dalam http://search.proquest.com/) vol. 82 no. 21 (Dec. 2010), page 45-51.
Topik: Valve-terminal basic; Function modules; Tangible benefits; Controlling Pneumatic and electromechanical motion.
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
    • Nomor Panggil: MM44.63
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikel Today, OEMs of all stripes strive to supply equipment that is reliable, efficient, and safe to operate — and ultimately cuts operating costs and boosts productivity. But this is nothing new. Valve terminals — modular platforms that combine pneumatic valves with electronic interfaces — were invented two decades ago to help meet these same needs. Their success speaks for itself. Festo, Hauppauge, N. Y., for instance, has installed more than 100,000 units worldwide, and acceptance continues at a brisk pace. But the latest versions bear little resemblance to original designs. Capabilities now include not only pneumatics and I/O, but also electric drives, motion control, safety functions, and built-in diagnostics. Here's a closer look. When first introduced by Festo in 1989, "fieldbus-valve manifolds" offered several advantages over pneumatic systems built of stand-alone valves. In traditional systems, each individual valve needed a separate electrical connection and each solenoid coil had to be separately wired to the controller. Every valve also needed its own tubing and pneumatic connectors. This made installation expensive and presented plenty of opportunities for miswiring. More connections also meant lower reliability.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)