Anda belum login :: 23 Nov 2024 14:25 WIB
Detail
BukuExploratory Study of University as a Learning Organization (Case Study in Faculty of Economics - Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia)
Bibliografi
Author: Nilawati, Levi (Advisor); Budi, Andy Susilo Lukito (Advisor); HANDASTYA, NITA
Topik: Learning Organization; Learning In University; Organizational Culture; Quantitative And Qualitative Approach; https://shared.com/dr8bwfbq9j?s=l
Bahasa: (EN )    
Penerbit: Program Studi Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Unika Atma Jaya     Tempat Terbit: Jakarta    Tahun Terbit: 2014    
Jenis: Theses - Undergraduate Thesis
Fulltext: Nita Handastya's Undergraduate Theses.pdf (869.64KB; 17 download)
[Informasi yang berkaitan dengan koleksi ini di internet]
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
    • Nomor Panggil: FEM-7922
    • Non-tandon: tidak ada
    • Tandon: 1
 Lihat Detail Induk
Abstract
University is a center of knowledge that produces both ideas and thinkers. However, can such institution automatically be called learning organization? Learning is the only mean of survival in this changing world, according to Senge (1990). In hierarchical organization such as a faculty, many things interfere with the learning process, just as other type of organization. The reason Faculty of Economics was chosen was the fact that it is the oldest and largest faculty and in its university. This paper attempt to study whether or not Faculty of Economics is a learning organization based on Senge’s five disciplines. This paper conducted both qualitative and quantitative approaches to explain the learning organization in the context of educational institution. Method of data collection was divided by survey and semi structured interview. The questionnaire was based on Neefe (2001) and the interview was based on Senge (1990). The respondents are both academic and administrative employees of the faculty, to provide broader view. According to the quantitative approach, most respondents agree that faculty of Economics is a learning organization. However, qualitative approach resulted in fairly different conclusion. While the first approach shows the concept of learning organization, the latter shows that things are not as it seems since there are forces that drive the system in an invisible way. Indeed, both approaches complement one another, providing a fuller image of the faculty. The findings also show that system thinking is most fundamental discipline, but it is still affecting greatly by the mental models of the faculty member.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Lihat Sejarah Pengadaan  Konversi Metadata   Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.171875 second(s)