Membaca John Rawls dalam Terang Dialog Antarperadaban  

Oleh:

Madung, Otto Gusti Nd.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional - terakreditasi DIKTI
Dalam koleksi: Diskursus: Jurnal Filsafat Teologi STF Driyarkara vol. 09 no. 01 (Apr. 2010), page 1-24.
Topik: Keadilan; Posisi Asali; Doktrin Komprehensif; Liberalisme Politik; Overlapping Consensus
Fulltext: 96-membaca-john-rawls-dalam-terang-dialog-antarperadaban (win).pdf (424.01KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKPM Nomor Panggil: D49 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The clash of civilisations is a clear result of the globalization process. Thus the question of whether inter-cultural dialogue is possible becomes crucial. A response to this issue is not only a concern for the social sciences; philosophy also has a role is seeking out a rational foundation for life together amidst a plurality of ideologies and concepts of the good life. Immanuel Knt, for instance, attempted to create a consensus based on formal moral law with universal application. However, Kant's claim to universal rationality has been criticized as being caught up in Western ethnocentrism. John Rawls, nurtured in Kant's tradition, attempts to translate Kant's rational concept in a new way in order to bridge the variety of cultures and life-views of modern society. To do this Rawls develops a theory of justice. However, Rawls' concept of justice displays a number of fundamental weaknesses as a n instrument of inter-cultural dialogue since it is still enmeshed in a particular concept of the good life as conceived of by Western society. Rawls proposes the concept of an overlapping consensus to overcome inter-cultural and life view conflicts in a pluralistic society.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali