Kualitas Data Imunisasi Rutin Berdasarkan Metode Data Quality Self Assessment (DQS)  

Oleh:

Tarigan, Ingan

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional - terakreditasi DIKTI
Dalam koleksi: Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan vol. 19 no. 01 (Mar. 2009), page 15-24.
Topik: Immunization; Quality; DQS Method
Fulltext: M45 Vol 19, No 1 Mar (2009) p15.PDF (808.41KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKPM Nomor Panggil: M45 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada	Lihat Detail Induk
Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: M32.K.2 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada	Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Reporting and Recording System on immunization in Indonesia have been faced with many difficulties. Data quality and accuracy are the main problem that can be found in Puskesmas, District Health Office and also in Provincial Health Office. Usually, Health information system is limited on data collecting activity but not following by analyzing it. Therefore, this current system can't support/provide valuable (immunization)information as needed by the stakeholders. This research was conducted in 3 provinces in Indonesia.Selected study areas were Lampung province (Metro city and Lampung Selatan district); West Java Province (Bogor city and Garut district), East Nusa Tenggara Province (Kupang city and Belu district).The objectives of this study were to assess the quality of recording and reporting system of immunization based on the DQS method. Study design was cross sectional. Assessment was carried out with Data Quality Self-Assessment (DQS) method, using qualitative design by conducting interview and observation. Data quality of Immunization program was divided into 5 groups: recording, reporting,demography/denominator, availability ofform, and data utilization. The assessment on DQS method showed that not all immunization services was reported by heath providers; data processed manually; archiving system was not well managed; lack of provided forms for recording and reporting forms; data was not reported in time; set up the immunization target was not standardized among areas (jar every administrative levels); monitoring was not conducted optimum to evaluate the performance of immunization program; and capacity building on human resources was urgently needed to improve the quality of immunization program.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali