Unpaid Entitlement Recovery in the Federal Industrial Relations System: Strategy and Outcomes 1952-95  

Oleh:

Goodwin, Miles ; Maconachie, Glenda

Jenis: Article from Journal - e-Journal
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Industrial Relations vol. 49 no. 4 (Sep. 2007), page 523–544.
Topik: arbitration inspectors; enforcement; entitlements; strategy
Fulltext: 523.pdf (489.21KB)

Isi artikel

Despite awards and industrial agreements providing legally binding conditions of employment, many Australian employees do not always secure their employment entitlements. The inspection and prosecution strategies adopted by or forced upon the agency tasked with monitoring and enforcing the regulations are a key factor affecting whether or not employees will recover monies owed from non-compliant employers. This article examines the outcomes of different inspection and prosecution regimes between 1952 and 1995 in the Australian federal industrial relations system, and makes three points. The first is that employer evasion of employee entitlements has been significant, and sustained. Second, the shift from routine inspections to a complaints-based inspection strategy has reduced the probability of detection and subsequently encourages employer evasion. Third, the use of prosecution as a tool of ‘last resort’ has provided little deterrence to employer non-compliance. The extent of evasion in a centralized industrial relations system raises questions about evasion in decentralized systems.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali