Pragmatism, Principles and Policy: Federalism and Industrial Relations Regulation in Australia  

Oleh:

Lyons, Michael ; Khoshaba, Thomas

Jenis: Article from Journal - e-Journal
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Industrial Relations vol. 51 no. 2 (Apr. 2009), page 173–194.
Topik: centralized regulation; constitutional change; Howard; Whitlam; Work Choices
Fulltext: 173.pdf (211.07KB)

Isi artikel

Traditionally, industrial relations in Australia have been governed by a dual system of federal and State regulation. In recent decades there have been two attempts to create a single national system of industrial relations regulation. In 1973, the Whitlam (Australian Labor Party) government proposed two constitutional alteration referendum questions to give the federal parliament plenary law making powers over ‘prices’ and ‘incomes’, and consequently industrial relations. In 2005, the Howard (Liberal–National parties coalition) government used the existing constitutional law making powers of the federal parliament, the corporations power, to widen the coverage of the federal industrial relations system with the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005 (Cth) to capture about 85 percent of Australian employees. This article compares and contrasts these two efforts to create a national industrial relations system. The analysis shows that both efforts illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of federalism generally and suggests the political nature of industrial relations policy in Australia remain regardless of the regulatory jurisdiction.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali