The Construction worker in Residence 8 @ Senopati project done their material handling manually, on the process they have unsafe working posture. Based on Nordic Body Map questioner winch consist of average complain from all of the workers explain
the increasing result from the before and after work, based on OWAS rating and Bloswick Mode generally also show a unsafe result.
The unsafe working posture has been analyzed based on 3 different methods, the first is workers complaint, the second is OWAS, and the third is Bloswick Model. From the workers complaint in general the body parts that frequently used in works, which having an increasing complaint. The usage of OWAS methods explain that generally a
work can be said unsafe because having a body position such as bend, side, squat which repeatedly done. In general the usage of Bloswick Model explain that works are unsafe if the bended angle on the workers show a big result, more heavy burden and the far distance between the workers and the burden.The OWAS average evaluation, there are on worker name Hartono 2,65; ;Martha 2,64; Puji Cahyono 2,61; Adih nilai 2,54; Ache
2,15; Icha 2,13; Dadang 2,13; Udin 2,04; Iriyano and Liswono 1,78 and 1,29. The result of Bloswick evaluation for job elements show generally are unsafe, worker name Icha with element job bring the iron to bending job station, Adih 1117,6; Martha 616,62; Irianto,Puji, Udin Dadang, Hartono are 289,37; 1250,87; 819,85; 909,34; 363,99;
257,22. Recommendation has been given in 2 ways, the first is for the working position the expectation is the unsafe position can be change into the safe position, and the second is working rotation, whereas a worker in doing his works can take shift with other workers and he can do other works. |