Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer's wrongdoing  

Oleh:

Barnett, Tim ; Bass, Ken ; Brown, Gene

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Business Ethics vol. 15 no. 11 (Nov. 1996), page 1161.
Topik: Religiosity; Ethical Ideology; Intentions; Peer's Wrongdoing

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: BB27.26 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Peer reporting is a specific form of whistleblowing in which an individual discloses the wrongdoing of a peer. Previous studies have examined situational variables thought to influence a person's decision to report the wrongdoing of a peer. The present study looked at peer reporting from the individual level. Five hypotheses were developed concerning the relationships between (1) religiosity and ethical ideology, (2) ethical ideology and ethical judgments about peer reporting, and (3) ethical judgments and intentions to report peer wrongdoing. Subjects read a vignette concerning academic cheating, and were asked to respond to a question-naire concerning the vignette. Data were analyzed using structural equation methodology. Results indicated that religiosity was positively associated with an ethical ideology of non-relativism. Individuals whose ethical ideologies could be described as idealistic and non-relativistic were more likely to state that reporting a peer's cheating was ethical. In turn, individuals who believed reporting a peer's cheating was ethical were more likely to say that they would report a peer's cheating.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali