After Virtue, Taking Rights Seriously  

Oleh:

McDonalds, Michael

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Business Ethics vol. 5 no. 1 (Feb. 1986), page 21-28.
Topik: Virtue; Pluralistic Conception

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: BB27.5 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

In this paper, I address the question, "Who are the political and ideological opponents of liberalism?" I suggest that Dworkin's way of dividng liberals from their conservative opponents over the issue of pluralism fails to get at the main issue of redistribution. But arguments for and against redistribution share a common pluralistic conception of politics and morals, viz., that they are to be conceived in terms of an agreement amongst autonomous individuals who are each trying to maximize their own welfares. I argue that this ignores our relations with the non-autonomous and is parasitic on a wider and more generous notion of the political and moral community. I suggest that such a community must form a focus of its members' loyalties and an end (telos) for human virtues. I then draw some lessons for business ethics, arguing that it is an essentially specialized enterprise which ought not to used to model moral and political relations in general.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali