Lone Geniuses in Popular Science: The Devaluation of Scientific Consensus  

Oleh:

Charney, Davida

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Written Communication ( sebagian Full Text) vol. 20 no. 3 (Jul. 2003), page 215-241.
Topik: rhetoric; 18th century; popular science; science journalism; scientific discourse; history of science
Fulltext: 215.pdf (245.67KB)

Isi artikel

Popular accounts of scientific discoveries diverge from scholarly accounts, stripping off hedges and promoting short-term social consequences. This case study illustrates how the “horse-race”framing of popular accounts devalues the collective sharing, challenging, and extending of scientific work. In her best-selling Longitude, Dava Sobel (1996) depicts John Harrison’s 18th-century invention of a marine chronometer, a groundbreaking precision instrument that eventually allowed sailors to calculate their longitude at sea, as an unequal race with Harrison as beleaguered hero. Sobel represents the demands of the Board of Longitude to test and replicate the chronometer as the obstructionist machinations of an academic elite. Her framing underreports the feasibility of the chronometer and its astronomical rival, the lunar distance method, which each satisfied different criteria. That readers accept Sobel’s framing is indicated by an analysis of 187 reviews posted on Amazon.com, suggesting that popular representation of science fuels cynicism in popular and academic forums.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali