Knowledge Consolidation Analysis: Toward a Methodology for Studying the Role of Argument in Technology Development  

Oleh:

Dyehouse, Jeremiah

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Written Communication ( sebagian Full Text) vol. 24 no. 2 (Apr. 2007), page 111-139.
Topik: knowledge consolidation analysis; symbolic engineering; rhetoric of technology; rhetorical figures; automated essay scoring; rating simulation
Fulltext: 111.pdf (142.74KB)

Isi artikel

Researchers studying technology development often examine how rhetorical activity contributes to technologies’ design, implementation, and stabilization. This article offers a possible methodology for studying one role of rhetorical activity in technology development: knowledge consolidation analysis. Applying this method to an exemplar case, the author describes how explanations of Project Essay Grade (PEG), the first initiative to computerize student essay assessment, made knowledge available about this technology project. More specifically, technologist Ellis Page and his coauthors reworked a key explanatory argument, a justification of PEG’s functioning, during the course of several decades, refining and clarifying its key contrasts and strengthening its presentation for generalist educators in particular. Analysis suggests that late presentations of the argument reveal that knowledge was successfully consolidated about a technical procedure Page and his coauthors called “rating simulation.” The conclusion discusses the key advantages and limitations of the method.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali