Objective Versus Perceived Vocal Interruptions in The Dialogues of Un - Acquainted Pairs, Friends, and Couples  

Oleh:

Crown, Cynthia L. ; Cummins, Debora A.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Language and Social Psychology (Full Text) vol. 17 no. 3 (1998), page 372-389.
Topik: OBJECTIVE TESTS; vocal interruptions; dialogues; unacquainted pairs; friends; coupls
Fulltext: Journal of Language and Social Psychology 1998 17. 372-389.pdf (1.96MB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: JJ37.2 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Two studies are presented that examined whether men interrip differntly than women and whether they are perceived to interrupt differently. First, 84 individuals participated in 25 - minute conversations that were automatically summarized as a set of vocal interruptive behaviours. Statistical analyses indicated no sex differeneces. The second study had 80 judges rate five of the videotapes from the first study (selected on the basis of highly similar objective interruptions) in terms of the how interruptive the judges viewed the conversationalists to be. Women were perceived to interrup significantly more than men. To help understand the descrepant findings, a subset of the original tapes was recorderd using a subjective procedure. Findings replicted those yielded by the objective coding method. This set of findings suggests that differences in the interruptive behaviour of men and women may be more perceived than actual.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali