Level of Threat : A Means of Assessing Interviewer Toughness and Neutrality  

Oleh:

Bull, Peter ; Elliott, Judy A.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Language and Social Psychology (Full Text) vol. 17 no. 2 (1998), page 220-244.
Topik: toughness; level of threat; interviewer; toughness; neutrality
Fulltext: Journal of Language and Social Psychology 1998 17. 220-244.pdf (2.51MB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: JJ37.2 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Eighteen interviews televised during the 1992 british general election were analysed to evaluate six leading political interviewers in terms of toughness and neurality. Though questions were defined as those where each of the principal modes of possible response presented some form of face threat (cf. no necessary threat questions, which allowed at least one type of response that was not intrinsically face threatening). Brian walden emerged as the toughest interciewer, with 48.4% of his questions carrying a face - threat in every direction, david frost was the softest (28.9% of questions). An analysis in terms of neurality showed that most interviewers gave john major the toughest interviews and paddy ashdown the easiest interviews, expect for frost, whose interviews showed the opposite trend. These findings were elaborated by a content analysis using 19 categories of face threat and a questionnaire in which observers rated the six interviewers in terms of thoughness and neurality.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali