Reliability and Validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment  

Oleh:

Abedi, Jamal ; O'Neil, Harold F., (Jr.)

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: JER: Journal of Educational Research, The vol. 89 no. 04 (Mar. 1996), page 234-245.

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKPM Nomor Panggil: J6 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

ABSTRACT An assumed advantage 01 alternative assessments is that they result in more higher level thinking or metacognitivc skills. We believe that this advantage should be measured directly and explicitly. Unfortunately. few standardized measures of metacognitive skills (planning, monitoring, cognitive strategies, and awareness) exist. In our studies, for 12th graders, alpha reliability estimates and factor analysis indicated that our metacognitive subscales are reliable (alpha above .70) and unidimensional (one factor per sub scale). Because the subscales have only 5 items each, they meet brevity standards. Construct validity of our state metacognitive inventory is acceptable. Results indicate that our state metacognitive Inventory yields useful information about both the assessment and students.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali