Response to Comments: Practical Wisdom in the Service of Professional Practice  

Oleh:

Shulman, Lee S.

Jenis: Article from Journal - e-Journal
Dalam koleksi: Educational Researcher vol. 36 no. 9 (Dec. 2007), page 560-563.
Fulltext: 560.pdf (243.23KB)

Isi artikel

The work of both scholarship and practice progresses as a consequence of dialogue, debate, and exchange. I am grateful to Rodney Evans (“Existing Practice Is Not the Template,” this issue of Educational Researcher [ER], pp. 553–559) for his comments on an earlier ER article that I cowrote with three colleagues at The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Shulman, Golde, Bueschel, & Garabedian, 2006, “Reclaiming Education’s Doctorates: A Critique and a Proposal”).1 It is gratifying that Evans took our work seriously enough to prepare a carefully argued and passionate critique of our proposals for reclaiming the education doctorate. When the dust settles, I anticipate it will be clear that we agree far more than we disagree. Much of our apparent disagreement is a consequence of our uses of language, our backgrounds, and the sources we regularly use. I am also grateful to the editors of ER for encouraging this exchange of ideas and proposals.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali