Reporting Unethical Research Behavior  

Oleh:

Wenger, Neil S. ; Korenman, Stanley G. ; Berk, Richard ; Liu, Hong

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Evaluation Review vol. 23 no. 5 (Oct. 1999), page 553-570.
Fulltext: 553.pdf (116.28KB)

Isi artikel

Scientists, as professionals, have a responsibility to self-regulate. However, whistleblowing is rare. We investigated scientists’ infrequent disclosure of unethical behavior by studying their responses to scenarios describing unethical research acts and compared their responses to those of research administrators. A cross-sectional survey was administered to National Science Foundation–funded principal investigators and their institutions’ representatives (IRs) to the Office of Research Integrity. Both scientists and IRs proposed to respond to nearly all research behaviors that they rated as unethical. Scientists more often proposed responses limited to the research team (58% vs. 25% of cases, p < .001) whereas IRs more often proposed to inform an administrator or dean, journal editor, funding agency, professional society, or reporter. The prior behavior and academic rank of the scenario protagonist were associated with responses, but consequences of the unethical behavior were not. Scientists appear to perceive that they uphold their responsibility to respond to unethical behavior by disclosures within the research team, whereas administrators propose to report to externally accountable individuals, raising the question of whether scientists’behavior constitutes professional self-regulation or cover up.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali