Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women Using Estradiol-Progestogen Therapy  

Oleh:

Lyytinen, Heli ; Pukkala, Eero ; Ylikorkala, Olavi

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Obstetrics and Gynecology vol. 113 no. 01 (Jan. 2009), page 65.

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: O01.K.2009.01 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk for breast cancer in Finnish women using postmenopausal estradiol (E2)-progestogen therapy. METHODS: All Finnish women over 50 years using E2-progestogen therapy for at least 6 months in 1994-2005 (N=221,551) were identified from the national medical reimbursement register and followed up for breast cancer incidence (n=6,211 cases) through the Finnish Cancer Registry to the end of 2005. The risk for breast cancer in E2-progestogen therapy users was compared with that in the general population. RESULTS: The standardized incidence ratio for all types of breast cancer was not elevated within the first 3 years of use, but it rose to 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.20-1.42) for the use from 3-5 years and to 2.07 (1.84-2.30) with 10 or more years of use. Exposure to sequential progestogen for 5 years or more was accompanied with a lower risk elevation (1.78, 1.64-1.90) than exposure to continuous use (2.44, 2.17-2.72). Oral and transdermal use of E2-progestogen therapy was associated with comparable risk elevations for breast cancer. The use of norethisterone acetate was accompanied with a higher risk after 5 years of use (2.03, 1.88-2.18) than that of medroxyprogesterone acetate (1.64, 1.49-1.79). The risk of lobular breast cancer increased sooner than that for ductal cancer and was detectable for E2-progestogen therapy use less than 3 years (1.35, 1.18-1.53). There was no excess risk of breast cancer with distant metastases among E2-progestogen therapy users. CONCLUSION: The use of E2-progestogen therapy is associated with an increased risk for breast cancer after 3 years of use. The risk is lower for sequential than for continuous use, but comparable for oral and transdermal use. The risk elevation may not be uniform for all progestogens. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali