A Comparison of Alternative Item Weighting Strategies on the Data Gathering Component of a Clinical Skills Performance Assessment  

Oleh:

Kahraman, Nilufer ; Clauser, Brian E. ; Margolis, Melissa J.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Academic Medicine (Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges) vol. 83 no. S10 (Oct. 2008), page S72.

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: A33.K.2008.03 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Background: Checklist scores used to produce the data gathering score on the Step 2 CS examination are currently weighted using an algorithm based on expert judgment about the importance of the item. The present research was designed to compare this approach with alternative weighting strategies. Method: Scores from 21,140 examinees who took the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 between May 2006 and February 2007 were subjected to five weighting models: (1) a regression weights model, (2) a factor loading weights model, (3) a standardized response model, (4) an equal weights model, and (5) the operational expert-judgment weights model. Results: Alternative weighting procedures may have a significant impact on the reliability and validity of checklist scores. Conclusions: The results suggest that the current weighting procedure is useful, and the regression-based model holds promise for practical application. The regression-based model produces scores that are more reliable than those produced by the current procedure and more strongly related to the external criteria.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali