Elapsed Time Between Teaching and Evaluation: Does It Matter?  

Oleh:

McOwen, Katherine S. ; Kogan, Jennifer R. ; Shea, Judy A.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Academic Medicine (Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges) vol. 83 no. S10 (Oct. 2008), page S29.

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: A33.K.2008.03 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Background: Web-based course evaluation systems offer the potential advantage of timely evaluations. The authors examined whether elapsed time between teaching and student evaluation of teaching impacts preclinical courses' quality ratings. Method: The overall relationship of elapsed time with evaluation rating was explored with regression and ANOVA. Time between teaching event and evaluation was categorized by weeks. Within-teaching-events means and variances in evaluations related to elapsed weeks were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: With more elapsed weeks, quality mean ratings increased (P < .001) and variability decreased (P < .001); effect sizes were small (average effect size = 0.06). Trends were similar in regression analysis and for data aggregated by event. Conclusions: Summaries of event quality are negligibly impacted by evaluation timing. Future studies should examine the impact of other Web-based evaluation features on evaluation.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali